2000 BMW 316 vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 316 (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | R 360 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 63 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |