2000 BMW 316 vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 383 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 316 (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 316 | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 316 | 220 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |
