2000 BMW 316 vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 218 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 316. (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 316 | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2640 mm |