2000 BMW 316 vs. 1981 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 512 kg more than 2000 BMW 316.
Because 2000 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 316 | 1981 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 316 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 6030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3090 mm |
