2000 BMW 316 vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 316 (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |