2000 BMW 316 vs. 1997 Jeep Dakar
To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Dakar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Dakar would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Dakar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Dakar (190 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (113 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316.
Because 2000 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Dakar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 316 | 1997 Jeep Dakar | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 316 | Dakar |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2760 mm |
