2000 BMW 316 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2000 BMW 316 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2000 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1047 kg more than 2000 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 316. (175 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 316 1999 Ford Econoline
Make BMW Ford
Model 316 Econoline
Year Released 2000 1999
Body Type Hatchback Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 7275 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 113 HP 213 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 2800 RPM
Torque 175 Nm 575 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 1800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1398 kg 2445 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3510 mm