2000 BMW 316 vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 316 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 316 (175 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 2001 Daewoo Vada | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 316 | Vada |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1313 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2530 mm |