2000 BMW 316 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 316 would be higher. Both 2000 BMW 316 and 2004 Mazda 6 are equipped with a 1,596 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2000 BMW 316.
Because 2000 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (231 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 316. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 316 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 231 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |