2000 BMW 316 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 316 (105 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2000 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 316 (150 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 316 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 316 | Micra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 46 L |
