2000 BMW 318 vs. 1944 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 BMW 318 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2000 BMW 318.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 318 | 1944 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 318 | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1944 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 5676 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1860 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3280 mm |