2000 BMW 318 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 BMW 318 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Buick 40 (193 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2000 BMW 318. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2000 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (410 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 318. (180 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 318.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 318 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 318 | 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 5279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3110 mm |