2000 BMW 318 vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2000 BMW 318 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 318 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1959 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 318 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 318 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1959 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 318 | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | 318 | TR3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 29 L |