2000 BMW 318 vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 BMW 318 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2000 BMW 318. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 515 kg more than 2000 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 318 | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 318 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 6638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 339 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |