2000 BMW 318 vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2000 BMW 318 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2000 BMW 318. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 782 kg more than 2000 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 318 | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 318 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1894 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
