2000 BMW 318 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 BMW 318 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,894 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 BMW 318 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 318 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 318 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 318 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 318 (180 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 318 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 318 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | 318 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1894 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |
