2000 BMW 320 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 320 (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 320 (211 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 320 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | BMW | Triumph |
| Model | 320 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 211 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
