2000 BMW 320 vs. 1963 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 320 (170 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 320 (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 320 1963 Zastava 1300
Make BMW Zastava
Model 320 1300
Year Released 2000 1963
Engine Size 2171 cc 1295 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 170 HP 53 HP
Torque 210 Nm 93 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1595 kg 980 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4040 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2430 mm