2000 BMW 320 vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 320 | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 320 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 95 L |
