2000 BMW 320 vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 725 kg more than 2000 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 320 | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 320 | Camargue |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 107 L |
