2000 BMW 320 vs. 1980 Zastava 750

To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 320 (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 320 (211 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 750. 2000 BMW 320 has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW 320 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: