2000 BMW 320 vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 137 kg more than 1990 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 320. (211 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 320 | 1990 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 320 | XJR |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 377 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 102 mm |
Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 237 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |