2000 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 320. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 320 2004 Ford Mustang
Make BMW Ford
Model 320 Mustang
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2171 cc 4009 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 170 HP 211 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1595 kg 1520 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 60 L