2000 BMW 320 vs. 2005 Mazda 6

To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6.

Because 2000 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 320. (211 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 320 2005 Mazda 6
Make BMW Mazda
Model 320 6
Year Released 2000 2005
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2171 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 170 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 211 Nm 260 Nm
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1630 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 68 L