2000 BMW 320 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 320 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 320. (214 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 320. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2000 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 2000 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 320 2012 Jaguar XF
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 320 XF
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Convertible Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2171 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 168 HP 271 HP
Torque 214 Nm 600 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2908 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 70 L