2000 BMW 323 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2000 BMW 323 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 323 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 323 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 323 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2960 mm |
