2000 BMW 323 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 BMW 323 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 323 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 323 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | 323 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2010 mm |
