2000 BMW 323 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2000 BMW 323 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 323 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 323 (245 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 323 | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |