2000 BMW 323 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2000 BMW 323. (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 188 kg more than 2000 BMW 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 323. (245 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 323.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 323 2002 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 323 CTS
Year Released 2000 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2494 cc 3173 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 168 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 296 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1618 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2900 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 66 L