2000 BMW 323 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 190 kg more than 2000 BMW 323.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 323. (245 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 323 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 323 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 312 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 78 L |