2000 BMW 323 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS

To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2000 BMW 323. (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 388 kg more than 2000 BMW 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 323. (245 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 323.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 323 2006 Cadillac STS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 323 STS
Year Released 2000 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2494 cc 4565 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 168 HP 321 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 427 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1818 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 66 L