2000 BMW 323 vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 323 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 2000 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 323 (245 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Etude. (164 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Etude. 2000 BMW 323 has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Etude has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Etude will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 323 | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 323 | Etude |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 164 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1112 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |