2000 BMW 323 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 323 weights approximately 625 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2000 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 323 (245 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio. 2000 BMW 323 has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 BMW 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 323 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 323 | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |