2000 BMW 323 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2000 BMW 323. (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (420 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 323. (245 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 323 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 323 | XF |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 420 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |