2000 BMW 323 vs. 2010 Acura TL
To start off, 2010 Acura TL is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Acura TL. (305 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2010 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura TL weights approximately 187 kg more than 2000 BMW 323.
Because 2010 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura TL (370 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 323. (245 Nm). This means 2010 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 323 | 2010 Acura TL | |
| Make | BMW | Acura |
| Model | 323 | TL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 370 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1797 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4966 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
