2000 BMW 323 vs. 2012 Buick Regal

To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 323 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2012 Buick Regal. (182 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2012 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick Regal weights approximately 23 kg more than 2000 BMW 323.

Because 2000 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 323 (245 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Buick Regal. (233 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 323 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Buick Regal.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 323 2012 Buick Regal
Make BMW Buick
Model 323 Regal
Year Released 2000 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 326 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 233 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1633 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4831 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1857 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2738 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 68 L