2000 BMW 325 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 BMW 325 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 BMW 325. (168 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 553 kg more than 2000 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 325 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 325 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
