2000 BMW 325 vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 2000 BMW 325 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Elan would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 325 (168 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1998 Kia Elan. (151 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Elan.
Because 2000 BMW 325 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 325. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 325 (245 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Elan. (186 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 325 | 1998 Kia Elan | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | 325 | Elan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 151 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2270 mm |
