2000 BMW 328 vs. 1956 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (217 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (192 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 116 kg more than 2000 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (433 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 328 | 1956 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 328 | 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 5279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 433 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3110 mm |