2000 BMW 328 vs. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado (198 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (192 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 687 kg more than 2000 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 328 | 1974 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 328 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 8191 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 2275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3220 mm |