2000 BMW 328 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 328 (192 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 328 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 328 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1770 mm |