2000 BMW 328 vs. 1995 Tata E
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Tata E would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 328 (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1995 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1995 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 328 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1995 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 328 (279 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 328 | 1995 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | 328 | E |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2810 mm |