2000 BMW 328 vs. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 120 kg more than 2000 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 328 | 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | 328 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4960 mm |
