2000 BMW 328 vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 148 kg more than 2000 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2000 BMW 328 has manual transmission. 2000 BMW 328 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: