2000 BMW 328 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 328 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 275 kg more than 2000 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328.

Compare all specifications: