2000 BMW 328 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 328 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 328 (201 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2000 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW 328 (279 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2000 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 328 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 328 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 279 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2619 mm |
