2000 BMW 330 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2000 BMW 330 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 330 (215 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 330 weights approximately 29 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 330 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | BMW | Hudson |
| Model | 330 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 247 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3160 mm |
