2000 BMW 520 vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 2000 BMW 520 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 520 (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 520 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 520 | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | BMW | Simca |
Model | 520 | 8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2430 mm |