2000 BMW 520 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 BMW 520 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 520 (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 520 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 520. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 520 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | 520 | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 31 L |