2000 BMW 520 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 BMW 520 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 BMW 520. (168 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2000 BMW 520. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 BMW 520 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 520 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2171 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
